Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Miller

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 22, 1983No. 83-33PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Earns

These consolidated cases are here on the pleadings. The verified complaints for mandamus allege that the plaintiffs, Pauline Carroll and Vaneta Curtis, applied to the Illinois Department of Public Aid (IDPA), at Jefferson and White County offices, for financial and medical assistance under the Aid to the Aged, Blind and Disabled program (AABD). The complaints further allege that the applications for assistanee were approved on a presumptive eligibility basis and plaintiffs began receiving assistance but that AABD assistance was later denied because the plaintiffs had been determined not to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Illinois State Chamber of Commerce v. Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Johnson v. QuernAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Noyola v. Bd. of Educ. of City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Nugent v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Watterson v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Noyola v. Bd. of Educ. of City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Noyola v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API