Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

First Federal Bank v. Mulder (In Re Mulder)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided February 19, 2004No. 19-00321PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

WILLIAM L. EDMONDS, Bankruptcy Judge.

The matter before the court is First Federal Bank’s complaint to determine dischargeability of its claim against Richard Roy Mulder and Tami Sue Mulder, the debtors. Final trial was held on January 14, 2004 in Sioux City. Jeffrey L. Poulson appeared as attorney for First Federal Bank (hereinafter “Bank”). A. Frank Baron appeared as attorney for Richard and Tami Mulder. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(I).

Findings of Fact

Richard and Tami Mulder, husband and wife, filed their joint chapter 7 petition on January 7,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Cohen v. De La CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. First National Bank of Olathe, Kansas v. Thomas M. Pontow Ann M. PontowCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Sanford Institution for Savings v. GalloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. Burt v. Maurer (In Re Maurer)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Steier v. BestCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. Helena Chemical Co. v. Richmond (In Re Richmond)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2010
  3. In Re LittleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
  4. Ghadimi v. AshaiDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  5. Keogh v. Fleming Manufacturing Co. (In re Keogh)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API