Legal Opinion

Lockridge v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 30, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

Complainant’s bill ivas dismissed and he has appealed. A statement of the case and brief has been filed by the appellant but no assignment of error. The brief in conclusion insists that appellant had a right to maintain this suit and to collect from appellee the amount of appellant’s bill, $518.25. We will not enforce the rule as to assignments of error, no question having been made by the attorney for the defendant, and treat the brief as supporting an assignment of error: that the Chancellor erred in dismissing complainant’s bill.

Chancellor Ketchum filed an opinion in this cause in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williard v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. State ex rel. McConnell v. Park Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Manning v. Prudential InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Parmer v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Interstate Life & Accident Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  2. Geddes & Moss Undertaking & Embalming Co. v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API