Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hice v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 11, 1980No. CR 79-181Published

1ConcurrenceJohn A. Fogleman, Chief Justice

I can agree that this judgment should and must be affirmed, regardless of the meaning given the word “vagina.” Reading the collective legislative mind is sometimes a difficult task and occasionally the answer seems to lie in the mind of the interpreter, who, as human beings are prone to do, sees what he would like to see in the legislative language. The really basic rule of legislative construction is that, when the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, the words are given their plain, usual and ordinary meaning and there is no resort to rules of construction, the crutches upon…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of North Little Rock v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Berry v. SaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. McClure v. McClureSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Poe v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  5. Terral v. Terral, Admx.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API