Legal Opinion

Sutherland v. Egger

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 6, 1989No. 88-3288PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER, Circuit Judge.

The appeal in this tax refund case presents the question of whether sums paid to former Conrail workers whose employment was terminated pursuant to a termination allowance provision enacted by Congress in 1981 as part of the railroad reorganization package are excluded from federal income taxation. Ruling on a motion for judgment on the pleadings, the district court found that the payments were excluded. We reverse.

I

Plaintiffs/appellants (“taxpayers”) are twelve former Conrail workers. In 1982, they were awarded lump sums of up to $25,000 from Conrail…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Commissioner v. TellierSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. Wells Fargo BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Martin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  5. Carol M. Herbert and Henry W. Herbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BaileyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1992
  2. Sutherland v. EggerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API