Legal Opinion
Doyle-Vallery v. Aranibar
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 31, 2003No. 2D02-2311PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
838 So.2d 1198 (2003)
Deanna DOYLE-VALLERY, M.D.; Deanna Doyle-Vallery, M.D., P.A.; and Corcoran, Easterling & Doyle-Vallery, Ltd., Appellants,
v.
Julie B. ARANIBAR and Richard Aranibar, M.D., Husband and Wife, Appellees.
No. 2D02-2311.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
January 31, 2003.
Richard R. Garland of Dickinson & Gibbons, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellants.
Theodore C. Eastmoore, Patricia D. Crauwels, and Alan W. Roddy of Matthews, Eastmoore, Hardy, Crauwels & Garcia, Sarasota, for Appellees.
2Per curiam
The defendants, Deanna Doyle-Vallery, M.D.; Deanna Doyle-Vallery, M.D., P.A.; and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. QuanstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. SarkisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Gingola v. VelascoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
4Cited by2 opinions
- Sarkis v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Doyle-Vallery v. AranibarSupreme Court of Florida · 2005