Legal Opinion

Bray v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 20, 1914No. 5288PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Lexington — Judge Cloud. September 8, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

Arnold brought suit against Bray on a promissory note, payable to Maxwell Brothers & Company. In the peti-’ tion it is alleged that Maxwell Brothers & Company transferred and assigned the note to Nat D. Arnold, the plaintiff, but such a transfer did not appear upon the copy of the note attached to the petition, nor was a copy of the transfer exhibited therewith. From the attached copy of the note it did not appear that there was a subscribing witness. The defendant demurred to the petition, because the note was payable to Maxwell Brothers & Company and the petition failed to show a copy of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Merritt v. BagwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Ross v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  3. Hardee v. LovettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Price v. Guardian Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Greenway v. Hayley Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Thornhill v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API