Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. Lakkonen

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 1, 1910No. 308PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. Action by Hilta Eakkonen, as administratrix of the goods and chattels of Alexander Eakkonen, deceased, against the Pennsylvania Steel Company, to recover damages resulting from the death of her husband, alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The action is brought under the employer’s liability act of the state of New York (Laws 1902, c. 600). Decedent was on the day in question in the employ of the steel company, which was erecting the Blackwell’s Island, bridge and was working under the charge of a subforeman' or “pusher” named Drummond. He was working at the.bottom of a post, constructed of plates riveted together with lacings on the sides. These posts- would be put in place by ptitting a pin through a-hole at :one end, , connecting the tackle of a *327derrick with the pin and lifting the post to a proper…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Finnigan v. New York Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Logerto v. . Central Building Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Bertolami v. United Enginering & Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Gypsum Co. v. SliwienskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  2. Proctor & Gamble Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API