Legal Opinion

Shults v. Liberty Cove, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 2006No. DA 06-0076PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Plaintiff and Respondent, Myra L. Shults, filed a complaint to enjoin Defendant and Appellant, Liberty Cove, Inc., from constructing condominiums on real property owned by Liberty Cove in Missoula County. Shults specifically contended that Liberty Cove was required to undergo subdivision review with Missoula County before the condominiums could be built. Liberty Cove filed a motion to dismiss Shults’s complaint which was converted to a Rule 56 motion for summary judgment because the motion discussed matters outside the complaint. Liberty Cove claimed the complaint should be dismissed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hern v. Safeco Ins. Co. of IllinoisMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Fleenor v. Darby School DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State Ex Rel. Florence-Carlton School District No. 15-16 v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of Great Falls v. Director of the Department of Public Health & Human ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Bay v. State, Dept. of Admin.Montana Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Giambra v. KelseyMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Peterson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Thornton v. Flathead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. DeVOE v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Mills v. Alta Vista Ranch, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API