Legal Opinion

Heffner v. Bock

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1981No. 655PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a nonjury trial in this assumpsit action, the lower court rendered a verdict for appellee in the amount of $6,550.00. Appellants subsequently filed exceptions, which the lower court en banc denied. Appellants then took this appeal from the order denying their exceptions.

An order denying exceptions following a nonjury trial is interlocutory and unappealable. Penstan Supply Co. v. Hay, 283 Pa.Super. 558, 424 A.2d 950 (1981). Accord, Lashner v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Philadelphia, 286 Pa.Super. 549, 429 A.2d 659 (1981); Unterberger v. Life Assurance Co. of Pa., 286…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Penstan Supply, Inc. v. HaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Slaseman v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Unterberger v. LIFE ASSUR. CO. OF PA.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Lashner v. REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ETC.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Thomas M. Durkin & Sons, Inc. v. Nether Providence Township School AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Coren v. DiDomenicoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Gadbois v. Leb-Co Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Hassler v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Sun Oil Co. v. BanghartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API