Legal Opinion
In Re Bushnell
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided October 27, 1998No. 2:96-cv-00352PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER 1
SESSIONS, District Judge.
Fifty-six claimants (“Claimants”) collectively appeal from an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Vermont (Conrad, J.) which granted summary judgment and disallowed their civil RICO claims on the ground that they are time-barred by the applicable four-year statute of limitations. In re Bushnell, 199 B.R. 843 (Bankr.D.Vt.1996). The Bankruptcy Court’s decision represents a final judgment in a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), and this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1) and (e)(1)(A).
On…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bankers Trust Company v. Daniel Rhoades, Herman Soifer and Milton BratenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Lanza v. Merrill Lynch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,479 Samuel Mallis and Franklyn B. Kupferman, Cross-Appellants v. Bankers Trust Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Dodds v. Cigna Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 131 Main Street Associates v. MankoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- In Re BushnellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2001
- In Re BushnellDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2000