Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Davis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 27, 2005No. PCD-2003-686Published

1Concurrence

C. JOHNSON, JUDGE,

specially concurring.

¶ 1 I specially concur in the well-reasoned decision by the Court. I personally have a problem with the application of procedural bar, and the use of such terms as “procedural bar,” “bar” and “waiver,” which strictly prohibit consideration of legal issues raised on appeal. I am troubled by the use of these procedural rules which keep this Court from reviewing potentially meritorious claims involving factual innocence, and ineffective assistance of counsel when counsel at trial and on appeal are the same or counsel on appeal and post-conviction counsel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lahey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API