Legal Opinion
Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad Commission
Texas Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1933No. Motion No. 10,530; Cause No. 6283PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Judge LEDDY
of the Commission of Appeals delivered the opinion for the court.
Defendants in error have filed a motion to dismiss the writ of error in this case on the ground that the questions presented for decision are now moot.
This suit involves an attack made by plaintiff in error on a proration order of the Railroad Commission of Texas promulgated under the terms of the oil conservation statutes as they existed prior to August, 1931. The order sought to be annulled expired by its own terms subsequent to the rendition of the judgment in this case. In addition to this, the conservation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Alejandrino v. QuezonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Leonard & Leonard v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Railroad Commission v. MacmillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
3Cited by11 opinions
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Texas Foundaries, Inc. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers UnionTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Hulett v. West Lamar Rural High School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Tarpley v. EppersonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.