People v. Alvarez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
In this case, the assistant district attorney made abortive attempts to offer proof which was clearly incompetent. In addition, he indulged in improper comment during summation. Adequate rulings by the trial court prevented error prejudicial to the defendant.
Trial tactics like those employed by the prosecutor in this case, could result in reversible error, even in the face of prompt action by the Presiding Judge, if the defendant were thereby deprived of a fair trial.
We reiterate that it is as much the function of the prosecutor as it is of the court to assure a fair trial to a defendant. “…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. . SloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- People v. . VogelgesangNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- People v. MaloneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957