Legal Opinion

People v. Witherspoon

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 6, 1975No. 60502PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goldberg

After a jury trial, Ronald Witherspoon (defendant) was found guilty of rape (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 38, par. 11—1) and was sentenced to 5 to 15 years. He has appealed.

In this court defendant urges that identification testimony was improperly received; the evidence was not sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; prejudicial trial error resulted from improper cross-examination of defendant and improper final argument by the prosecutor; and that the sentence was excessive. The position of the State is that the identification testimony was properly received as defendant was…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. People v. PickettIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. PrimIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. The People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  4. The People v. HairstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1972

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. People v. GardnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. People v. SakalasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. People v. DeesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. People v. BoydAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. People v. EcklesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API