Martinez v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASKIN, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for burglary of a habitation. The jury found appellant guilty as charged and answered “true” to the enhancement paragraph of the indictment. Punishment was assessed at nineteen (19) years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. Appellant now presents eighteen (18) grounds of error. We affirm.
In his first ground of error, appellant attacks the sufficiency of the evidence to support the instant conviction. Specifically, appellant maintains that there is no evidence to indicate that the items found in appellant’s car at the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- People v. BraaschAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- James Musgrove v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- G.K.G. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- De Albuquerque v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.