Legal Opinion

Matter of Hanley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1994No. 49S00-9212-DI-935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION (SUBSTITUTE OPINION)

2Per curiam

The Respondent, J. Frank Hanley, II, was charged in a "Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action" with several violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. All charges arise out of Respondent's representation of Christopher M. Butler. The Respondent and the Disciplinary Commission have tendered for this Court's approval a "Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline" pursuant to Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 11(d). The Respondent also tendered the requisite affidavit, pursuant to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of GerardIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Matter of BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re BaggerlyIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In re EarhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In the Matter of: Trezanay M. AtkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API