Doleva v. Bramley

Exceptions overruled. Judgment for the defendants. Following the decision in Doleva v. Tedeschi’s Super Market, Inc. 344 Mass. 539, two *768plaintiffs in that case brought the present action “for deceit, conspiracy and negligence.” The defendants are (1) Tedeschi’s Super Markets, Inc., a defendant in the earlier action1; (2) its insurer, Aetna Insurance Company; (3) its counsel in the earlier action; (4) Halpem Associates, Inc., successor of Halpern-Abelson, Inc., a defendant in the earlier action; (5) that defendant’s attorney in the earlier action; and (6) an employee of Tedeschi’s Super…