Legal Opinion

Dawes v. The People of the State of California

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 13, 2024No. 3:19-cv-02122Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM DAWES, Case No. 19-cv-2122-MMA (VET) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 vs. DENYING MOTION FOR SPEEDY 14 HOWARD AUSBURY, et al. TRIAL, APPOINTMENT OF 15 Defendants. COUNSEL, AND OBJECTION TO STAY; AND 16 17 [Doc. No. 89] 18 DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO 19 UPDATE PLAINTIFF’S ADDRESS 20 21 Plaintiff William Dawes, a California inmate proceeding pro se, has brought this 22 civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against Defendants Ausbury, Bravo, 23 Gene, Ugalde, Silva, Shellano, Ayala, Solis, and Zuniga. See…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Palmer v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Chapman v. MeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API