Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Paralyzed Veterans of America
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 1, 1996No. Civil Action 95-0409 (JR)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERTSON, District Judge.
This case proceeded to trial before a jury on Susan Schwartz’s claim that the termination of her employment by Paralyzed Veterans of America (i) was unlawful sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (DCHRA) and (ii) breached a contract of employment established by provisions of PVA’s Personnel Policies and Procedures Manual. After plaintiff rested, defendant moved for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 50(a). I granted the motion, ruling from the bench (i) that the PVA…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sandra G. Bundy v. Delbert Jackson, Director, D.C. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Wilma Cumpiano A/K/A Wilma Cumpiano Sanchez v. Banco Santander Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Jeroyd W. Greene v. Howard University, a Corporation, Nathan Hare v. Howard University, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carter v. RubinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- McFadden v. Ballard, Spahr, Andrews, & Ingersoll, LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Arkansas Public Employees v. GT SolarDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
- Oko v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023