Legal Opinion

Cleveland v. Wilken

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided February 27, 1996No. 95-8784-CIVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

GONZALEZ, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this case are migrant farm workers and their legal services attorneys; a civil rights activist; and the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, Inc. According to Plaintiffs, Florida Statute § 57.011 imposes upon them a constitutionally impermissible burden, and has barred or threatens to bar their access to state courts. The challenged section provides as follows:

When a nonresident plaintiff begins an action or when a plaintiff after beginning an action removes himself or his effects from the state, he shall file a bond with surety to be approved…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baltayan v. Estate of GetemyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Baltayan v. Estate of GetemyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Cleveland v. Clerk, Fifteenth JudCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API