Legal Opinion

Granowitz v. Hay Foundry & Iron Works

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 16, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cukiam.

The prosecutor seeks by writ of certiorari to review a judgment of the Essex County Court of Common Pleas affirming an award by the workmen’s compensation bureau rendered in a proceeding wherein Albert Granowitz, an employe of the prosecutor, was the petitioner, and the present prosecutor was the respondent. Eor convenience Hay Eoundry & Iron Works will be referred to as the employer and Albert Granowitz as the employe. The workmen’s compensation bureau determined that the employe “met with an accident arising *1166out of and. in the course of his employment * * * while attempting to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Belth v. Anthony Ferrante & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  2. Richardson v. Essex National Trunk, C., Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  3. Vandenberg v. John De Kuyper SonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. Belth v. Anthony Ferrante & Son, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  5. Rightmyer v. Totowa BoroughPassaic County Superior Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API