Legal Opinion

Artemio Milares Bucsit, Former Husband v. Marie Jean Camara Bucsit, Former Wife

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 18, 2017No. 17-0801PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJay, J.

We affirm in all respects the Amended Order on All Pending Motions, which grants in part and denies in part each of the parties’ respective petitions to modify the earlier Consent Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. 1 We write only to explain the propriety of the trial court’s decision—without notice to, or input from,, either party—to “rehear” and amend its initial order. The trial court’s power to do so directly derives from the unambiguous provisions of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530(d).

Within nine days of entering its Order on All Pending Motions, the trial court entered an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Shelby Mutual Ins. Co. of Shelby, Ohio v. PearsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  3. Cole v. ColeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. Balmoral Condominium Ass'n v. GrimaldiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. TERENCE DOUGLAS v. BEULAH DOUGLASDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API