Legal Opinion

Ries v. MTD Products, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 4, 1983No. 1099PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

The Plaintiff-Appellees instituted this products liability action in the lower court to recover damages arising out of injuries which the Plaintiff wife suffered as a result of an accident which occurred while she was riding a bicycle on May 27, 1976. The cause of action was instituted in assumpsit and trespass against the manufacturer of the bicycle, MTD Products, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as “MTD”), the distributor, National Independent Distributor Associates, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “NIDA”), and the retailer, Patrick V. Nudi, t/d/b/a Bikes N’ Things…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Sabloff v. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. Sabloff v. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  4. Caporale v. RALEIGH INDUSTRIES OF AM., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mamone, F. v. St. Clair MemorialSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Pscolka, T. v. Boehme, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API