Commonwealth v. Simpson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWelkins, C.J.
This appeal, here for further appellate review at the request of the Commonwealth, presents issues arising out of the Appeals Court’s concern that the trial judge did not conduct a hearing on the defendant’s competence to stand trial. The Appeals Court, which pursued the issue on its own motion, reversed the defendant’s convictions because it concluded that the trial judge should have conducted a competency hearing “in light of [the defendant’s] bizarre performance” while representing himself at trial. Commonwealth v. Simpson, 44 Mass. App. Ct. 154, 163 (1998). The Appeals Court then remanded…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Commonwealth v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. BeanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Commonwealth v. PaintenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. ChatmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. ColleranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Robidoux v. O'BRIENCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.