Legal Opinion

Hensley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 14, 1973No. 45559Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part 1

DISSENTING IN PART and CONCURRING IN PART

2Concurring in part, dissenting in part · OdomOdom, Judge

I disagree with the majority opinion that the police were authorized to search the automobile in question. The appellant was seen standing near a U Totem Store in Houston some fifteen minutes before the store was to be closed for the night. The officer who observed appellant at that location had previously seen an automobile parked near a closed service station. Appellant was questioned by the officer as to whether the automobile near the service station was his and he replied that it was not. The officer then noticed a bulge in appellant’s pocket.…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API