Dagenhart v. State

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Larry Thomas Dagenhart appeals from his convictions for trafficking in methamphetamine (OCGA § 16-13-31) and using a cellular phone to facilitate a violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act (OCGA § 16-13-32.3). In his sole enumeration of error, Dagenhart contends that the trial court erred by admitting into evidence his custodial statement to police. We disagree and affirm.

In support of his argument that the trial court erred, Dagenhart cites Perry v. State, 175 Ga. App. 301 (333 SE2d 178) (1985). As the State correctly points out, the legal standard in Perry…