Abendroth & Root Manufacturing Co. v. W. S. Frazier & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from an order of the Special Term denying a motion to compel the plaintiff’s attorneys to accept service of an answer.
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from an order of the Special Term denying ijgfendani,’s motion to compel plaintiff’s attorneys to accept service of SB answer, *923The controversy is one of those unnecessary quarrels between attorneys which could and should have been adjusted by the exercise of a little mutual courtesy and forbearance, and from which the clients of neither can hope to reach any advantage. The questions raised are-technical in the extreme. The defendant’s last day to serve its answer was June 30, 1910. Defendant’s attorney undertook to serve it on that day by mail, sending it as a registered…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Saffold v. FellowsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926
- Abendroth & Root Mfg. Co. v. W. S. Frazier & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913