Legal Opinion

Glazer v. Sanet

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1928No. Appeal 73PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

Appellant brought this action of assumpsit in the Municipal Court. The writ was duly served on the defendant by the sheriff, on September 12, 1927, “by handing a true and attested copy to an adult member of his family at No. 2124 S. 6th St., in the County of Philadelphia, State of Pennsylvania, the dwelling house of the defendant.”

A plaintiff’s statement was filed, endorsed with the notice to the defendant required by the Practice Act of 1915, P. L. 483, See. 10, which was signed by plaintiff’s attorney. On the original statement on file in the prothonotary’s office…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lehigh Valley Insurance v. FullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
  2. Benwood Ironworks v. Hutchinson & Bro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  3. Dewar v. SpenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
  4. Gorman v. Hibernian Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Hopkins v. ForsythSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coleman Dining Car Co. v. Walsh, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1943
  2. Jones v. Lennox, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1952
  3. Schwab Adoption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API