Legal Opinion
Scott v. Scott
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 2, 1950No. 33610Published
1Opinion of the Court
203 Okla. 60 (1950)
218 P.2d 373
SCOTT
v.
SCOTT.
No. 33610.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
May 2, 1950.
John J. Carney, of Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.
E. William Brown, of Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.
HALLEY, J.
The defendant in error, plaintiff below, and the plaintiff in error, defendant below, who will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court, were married at Norman, Oklahoma, on June 13, 1935, in a ceremonial marriage, and lived together as man and wife until on or about September 7, 1947. During their marriage they accumulated furniture and a home (subject to a mortgage…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chancey v. WhinnerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Haile v. HaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Spradling v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Smyth v. SmythSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Cox v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.