Legal Opinion
Shahmoon Industries, Inc. v. Louis G. Imperato
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 10, 1964No. 14808_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
This is an action for fraud and breach of fiduciary relationship, brought by the plaintiff-appellant, Shahmoon Industries, Inc., formerly known as Warren Foundry and Pipe Corp. The basis for the action against Imperato, the defendant, lies in Imperato’s activities as consultant for Shahmoon in developing and exploiting a secret process developed by Imperato for the blocking of iron ore in order to make it suitable for use in the steel industry. Jurisdiction is asserted to be based on diversity of citizenship.
The complaint originally alleged that Shahmoon was incorporated in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Morris v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Kelly v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Paul J. MontleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Padilla-Mangual v. Pavía HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Eugene Tanzymore v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Young-Posen, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Jake Harold Bowman, Philip G. Griffin, A. Donald Brinton and Midland Industries, Inc. v. Curt G. Joa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Local 336, American Federation of Musicians, Afl-Cio, and Diane Martin v. Augustus Bonatz, T/a Aiebon InnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.