Legal Opinion

Bretz v. Samuel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 14, 2012No. 2012-C-1707PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.1

1. Granted. The decision of the appellate court is reversed; this case is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration of the *416trial court’s judgment in light of all relevant issues of fact and law contained in the record.

The defendant’s exception of prescription in the district court, which formally and specially urged the plea of acquisitive prescription, did not also serve as a formal and special plea of liberative prescription. See La. C.C. art. 3452; La. C.C.P. arts. 924 and 927(B). Because the peremptory exception of prescription, whether urged at the trial level or on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Succession of SamuelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Bretz v. SamuelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. LeGardeur v. ColemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API