Legal Opinion

Vasquez v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 2001PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the determination, following a Tier III disciplinary hearing, that he violated inmate rules 103.20 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [4] [ii] [soliciting money from non-family member]) and 180.17 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [26] [vii] [providing unauthorized legal assistance to another inmate]). Respondent concedes that the determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 180.17 is not supported by substantial evidence.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Vega v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Delgado v. HurlburtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Borrero v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Anderson v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stewart v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Rodriguez v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Gourdine v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Green v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Johnson v. LempkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API