Legal Opinion

People v. Love

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 19, 1991No. Nos. 1—89—1815, 1—89—1920 consPublished

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

Defendants, James D. Love and Percy Jenkins, were each convicted by a jury of two counts of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 56½, par. 1401.) They appeal, arguing that (1) they were denied a fair trial due to alleged errors in jury selection; (2) the “one-act-one-crime” rule requires vacature of their lesser convictions and sentences; and (3) the cumulative effect of alleged trial errors denied them a fair trial. We affirm in part, and vacate defendants’ lesser convictions and sentences, for reasons which follow.

Defendants were arrested…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. AlbaneseIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. FranklinIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. NewburyIllinois Supreme Court · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API