Plummer v. Bolger
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
This is an action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., as amended by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16. The case was tried to the court, sitting without a jury, and was presented in perhaps as able a manner as this Court has ever witnessed. Counsel for both sides are to be commended for their absolutely outstanding work. Indeed, the quality of their efforts has made decision in this case exceedingly difficult. It is, however, the Court’s duty…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Karl Parker, Jr. v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company T/a the Chessie System the B & O RailroadCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Richard GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARMSTRONG RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Gonzalez v. BolgerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sidney Bishopp v. District of Columbia, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Phillips v. Interstate Hotels Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Batson v. PowellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Hosick v. Chicago State University Board of TrusteesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Williams v. ChertoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.