Legal Opinion

Big L Corp. v. Courtland Construction Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 2008No. Docket 271880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action filed pursuant to the Construction Lien Act (CLA), MCL 570.1101 et seq., defendant Homeowner Construction Lien Recovery Fund appeals as of right the trial court’s June 29, 2006, judgment in favor of plaintiff The Big L Corporation. We reverse and remand.

In 2001, Mark and Amanda McDowell contracted with Courtland Construction Company to build a house. Courtland, a general contractor, contracted with plaintiff, a subcontractor, 1 to supply materials for the house. During construction, Courtland provided the McDowells’ bank with nine “Sworn Statements” listing the subcontractors…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Smith v. Globe Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Alan Custom Homes, Inc v. KrolMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Northern Concrete Pipe, Inc v. Sinacola Companies—midwest, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Vugterveen Systems, Inc. v. Olde Millpond Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. C D Barnes Associates Inc. v. Star Heaven, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Big L Corp. v. Courtland Const. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API