Legal Opinion
(PS)Crago v. Sacramento Sheriff
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 6, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02510Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARY J. CRAGO, No. 2:19-cv-02510-TLN-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SACRAMENTO SHERIFF, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. Plaintiff has requested authority pursuant to 18
28 U.S.C. § 1915
to proceed in forma pauperis. This proceeding was referred to this court by 19 Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by § 1915(a) showing that plaintiff is unable 21 to prepay fees and costs or give security for them. Accordingly, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Donald Robin BARREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tom HARRINGTON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Esther Mae CookeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980