Legal Opinion

Canulette Shipbuilding Co. v. Hursey Transportation Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 3, 1931No. 768PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Canulette Shipbuilding Company, Inc., alleges that it was required by Bank of Slidell to pay a note for $2,-000 on which it was the indorser, but of which Hursey Transportation Company, Inc., was the maker; that, having paid the note in conformity with its obligation as indorser, Hursey Transportation Company, . Inc., is indebted .to it for the amount paid, with interest and attorney’s fees as stipulated in the note..

The note in question is annexed to and made part of the petition.- -

Hursey Transportation Company, Inc., defendant, excepted to plaintiff’s petition on the ground that it did not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Canulette Shipbuilding Co. v. Hursey Transportation Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Canulette Shipbuilding Co. v. Hursey Transportation Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API