Ronald C. Rinard v. Y B H Sales and Service Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM F. SMITH, Circuit Judge.
The trial of this action for personal injuries resulted in a jury verdict in favor of the appellee and the entry of judgment thereon. Thereafter the appellant made a timely motion for judgment in -accordance with its earlier motion for a -directed verdict and, in the alternative, for a new trial. Fed.Rules Civ.Proe., rule 50(b), 28 U.S.C.A. The motion was •denied and the present appeal followed. ’The question raised on this appeal is a narrow one. The appellant argues that it was entitled to prevail on its motion for judgment because the appellee’s testimony…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dougherty v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Rafferty v. DiJohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stephen A. Walsh, in No. 15639 v. Miehle-Goss-Dexter, Inc., in No. 15640 v. Edward Stern and Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Howard Jamison, Administrator of the Estate of Albert Tucker, Deceased v. A. M. Byers CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Ursula Makariw, Administratrix of the Estate of Eugen Makariw, Deceased v. Ronald C. RinardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Alfred Brough v. Strathmann Supply Co., Inc., and Mermaid Pools, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Stephen A. Walsh, in No. 15639 v. Miehle-Goss-Dexter, Inc., in No. 15640 v. Edward Stern and Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967