Legal Opinion · Dissent

Snell v. Department of Professional Regulation

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 26, 2001No. 4-99-0876Published

1DissentJustice Cook

I respectfully dissent because I am unable to reconcile the majority’s decision with Illinois Supreme Court precedent.

State regulation of commercial speech is permissible by means of appropriate time, place, and manner restrictions and where such speech is false or misleading. Desnick, 171 Ill. 2d at 518, 665 N.E.2d at 1352. Further, the overbreadth doctrine, traditionally utilized in analyzing challenges to a regulation’s constitutionality, does not apply to commercial speech challenges. Desnick, 171 Ill. 2d at 519, 665 N.E.2d at 1353. Thus, the challenging party may not simply attack the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jacobson v. Department of Public AidAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API