Legal Opinion

In Re Westinghouse Electric Corp. Employment Discrimination Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided October 12, 1977No. 305PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

2Per curiam

This litigation consists of five actions 1 pending in two federal districts: Webb, Rivers, and Bradford in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; and Warren and EEOC in the Middle District of North Carolina. Westinghouse Electric Corporation is the only defendant in Rivers, Bradford, Warren and EEOC. Defendants in Webb include Westinghouse, several of its officers and managerial employees, two labor organizations that represent various employees at Westinghouse’s Lester, Pennsylvania facility, and the Secretary of Labor.

The named plaintiffs in Webb are four Black hourly…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Celotex Corp.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975
  2. In Re Royal American Industries, Inc. Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gramby v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. In Re Southern Railway Employment Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API