Legal Opinion
Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. Comm'r
United States Tax Court
Decided February 5, 1945No. Docket Nos. 108181-108187, 111395UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Addressograph-Multigraph Corporation et al., 1 v. Commissioner.
Addressograph-Multigraph Corp. v. Comm'r
Docket Nos. 108181-108187, 111395.
United States Tax Court
1945 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 310; 4 T.C.M. (CCH) 147; T.C.M. (RIA) 45058;
February 5, 1945
Leo H. Hoffman, Esq., 120 Wall St., New York, N. Y., for the petitioners. Laurence H. Bloomenthal, Esq., and W. W. Kerr, Esq., for the respondent.
MELLOTT
Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion
MELLOTT, Judge: The Commissioner determined deficiencies in income tax and excess profits tax as shown in the schedule below. The petitioners will be referred to…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Moline Properties, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Commissioner v. Scottish American Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- True v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- True v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Actavis Laboratories, Fl, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022