Legal Opinion

United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 23, 2008No. 07-2214PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to apply United States v. Zamudio-Carrillo, 499 F.3d 1206, 1209 (10th Cir.2007), and United States v. Valenzuela, 365 F.3d 892, 898 (10th Cir.2004), to determine whether there was sufficient evidence of tandem driving such that probable cause to arrest the driver of one vehicle established probable cause to arrest the driver of a second vehicle. The issue arose when defendant Jose Cruz Rodriguez-Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”) was observed by a Santa Clara Police Officer as he drove his red Nissan just ahead of a brown pickup truck along a lightly traveled…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Lundstrom v. RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. MassenburgCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API