Legal Opinion · Concurrence

West v. Marko

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 16, 2001No. COA99-1596Published

1ConcurrenceFuller, Judge

I join in the majority opinion. However, I write separately for emphasis.

The trial court’s initial custody order, awarding custody to the father, was the result of a hearing at which neither the mother nor the child were present. The court did not appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the interests of the child. The only evidence received by the court was presented by the father. Although the custody order was not technically denominated a default judgment, it was, in effect, a result reached by default, since the court heard only one side of the dispute.

Even in suits involving competent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estate of Teel Ex Rel. Naddeo v. DarbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Van Every v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Van Every v. McGuireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API