Legal Opinion

First State Bank v. Funston

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1937No. 26591PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HURST, ,T.

This is an action on a renewal promissory note, executed by L. T. Funston and E. V. Miller to the First State Bank under the following circumstances: The bank had made arrangements to act as clerk at a public sale of property belonging to Mrs. Funston, mother of one of the defendants, and as was its custom, it handled the notes given at the sale. Defendant Fun-ston purchased some property at the sale and the bank refused to accept hi® note without other indorsements. The next day, on October 1, 1931, he executed a note to defendant Miller for $106.60, procured Miller’s indorsement…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Novelty Import Co. v. MuncySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tulsa Industrial Loan & Investment Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API