Journal Co. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1. In 1937 petitioner issued and distributed as dividends notes of a fair market value equal to the face thereof, due January 1, 1939. It claimed and was allowed a dividends paid credit in 1937 on the aggregate amount of the notes.
Read the full summary
1. In 1937 petitioner issued and distributed as dividends notes of a fair market value equal to the face thereof, due January 1, 1939. It claimed and was allowed a dividends paid credit in 1937 on the aggregate amount of the notes. On July 1, 1938, petitioner paid and discharged the notes and claimed a dividends paid credit under section 27(a)(4), Revenue Act of 1938. Held, the general provisions of section 27(a)(4) are limited by the specific provisions of section 27(e), and petitioner is not entitled to a dividends paid credit in the amount paid in discharge of the notes. Spokane Dry Goods…
1Opinion of the Court
THE JOURNAL COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
Journal Co. v. Commissioner
Docket No. 106877.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
46 B.T.A. 841; 1942 BTA LEXIS 808;
April 3, 1942, Promulgated
1. In 1937 petitioner issued and distributed as dividends notes of a fair market value equal to the face thereof, due January 1, 1939. It claimed and was allowed a dividends paid credit in 1937 on the aggregate amount of the notes. On July 1, 1938, petitioner paid and discharged the notes and claimed a dividends paid credit under section 27(a)(4), Revenue Act of 1938. Held,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gibbs & Hudson v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936
- Journal Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1942
- Spokane Dry Goods Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941
- Heffelfinger v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935