Legal Opinion

Boston Belting Co. v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 5, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.

This is an action of tort. The declaration contains eight counts. The first seven counts are for similar causes of action occurring in different years. Each alleges in substance that the plaintiff owned land and buildings on Stony Brook, and was entitled to the natural and usual flow of its waters; that the city of Boston, acting under the St. of 1874, c. 196, undertook to alter, deepen, and widen the brook; that it did the work on the brook above the plaintiffs premises so negligently that the water poured- down in large and unusual quantities ; and that it negligently failed to provide and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morse v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  2. Washburn & Moen Manufacturing Co. v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Allen v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  2. Boston Belting Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Lancy v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Bacon v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  5. Boston Belting Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API