Legal Opinion

Moa v. Edwards

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 5, 2011No. 20100067-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:

T1 Plaintiff Seini Moa argues on appeal that the trial court erred when it excluded testimony of certain witnesses, who would have testified as either treating medical providers or expert witnesses (collectively, the witnesses), and when it refused to continue the trial date to allow further discovery regarding the witnesses. Additionally, Moa challenges the jury's apportionment of fault. We affirm.

12 Although she acknowledges that she disclosed the witnesses after the dead lines had passed to disclose both fact and expert witnesses, Moa argues that the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State Ex Rel. E.R.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  3. State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. K.F. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. R.O.A. General, Inc. v. Chung Ji DaiCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  2. Wakefield v. GutzmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API