Legal Opinion

Klinger v. Brownell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1840PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

This was an action of covenant against several defendants on a joint contract. One of the defendants appeared to the action, but did not plead; as to him, the plaintiff entered a nolle prosequi. A suggestion of “not found” was made as to. another defendant. The rest of the defendants made no appearance, and an' interlocutory judgment was entered against them for the default; and afterwards, on the execution, of a writ of inquiry, there was final-judgment, th'ough the record does not show that any of them had notice of the suit. *

T. Johnson, for the plaintiffs.

This judgment is erroneous. When…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Palmer v. CrosbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1821

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New Albany & Salem Railroad v. WelshIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Sargeant v. State Bank of IndianaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1848

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API