Y.H. v. F.L.H.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentPolston, J.
I agree that the trial court properly denied the appellant’s motion to consolidate. I also agree that appellant (“GP/Mother”) does not have a priority preference for adoption under section 63.0425(1), Florida Statutes (1999), because the purpose of the statute is to give a preference to grandparents who have established a relationship with the child after birth. Nevertheless, I respectfully dissent because I believe that GP/Mother should have been permitted to intervene. The lack of a statutory priority interest does not cause GP/Mother to have no interest at all. Florida intervention law,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- C.S. v. S.H.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Stefanos v. Rivera-BerriosSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- In Re Adoption of HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Hampton v. Hibernia Nat. BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.